I will preface this blog by saying that the analysis you will see is not a professional, and probably not even an accurate analysis. My political science experience is one semester at Wartburg College back in the fall of 2008. But even though I’m inexperienced, that doesn’t mean that I can’t have my say.
That being said, let’s look at some of the most spectacular results:
The results of the Senate race between Christine O’Donnell and Chris Coons was kind of a shocker. Despite O’Donnell’s many mistakes, from her “I’m Not A Witch” TV ad, to her “separation of church and state” blooper during one of the final debates, I honestly thought that she was still going to win. She had kind of a rabid fan base, and that alone, I was sure, was going to get her in. And yet, she loses, and quite considerably: Chris Coons with 54% of the vote, compared to O’Donnell’s 39%.
Honestly? Not a surprise. Even after the incident when a Rand Paul supporter stomped on the head of a MoveOn activist, Rand Paul wins the Kentucky Senate seat. Though his victory speech seemed a little off: “There is no rich, there is no poor. They’re all interconnected.” Rand Paul won with 51% of the vote.
Another race in which I was almost certain that the Tea Party candidate was going to win. Carl Paladino, a beastly looking creep with a penchant for bestiality videos and racism, lost. By a landslide. In a world where it seems like only the slimiest, most evil people make it to Washington, Andrew Cuomo soundly defeats Paladino, 57% to 32%.
John McCain easily wins his Senate seat, but the real focus of this election was for Governor. Jan Brewer made an absolute fool of herself during a live, televised debate, stumbling over her words, stuttering, and not making any sense. And that was just her prepared remarks. And somehow, despite an awful performance and falsely claiming that there were “headless bodies” in the Arizona desert, she manages to win the Governorship with 51% of the vote.
eBay entrepreneur Meg Whitman is defeated in the Governor race against Jerry Brown, with Brown getting 50% of the vote to Whitman’s 41%. Shocking, in that Whitman somehow managed to spend $142 million in campaigning and advertising. If anything, this race proves that name recognition doesn’t mean anything when you don’t have anything to back it up.
Also on the ballot: Proposition 19, which would regulate and tax marijuana, and allow people over 21 to grow or carry a certain amount of marijuana. Supporters of Prop 19 pushed the idea that this would get California out of debt. But it wasn’t enough: Prop 19 was defeated with 57% of the vote against it.
I mention this one, in part because I love talking about it: John Thune wins the South Dakota Senate race. His opponent? No one. He ran uncontested.
South Dakota also comes up because, as I’ve mentioned a couple of times before, the ballot included Referred Law 12, which would institute a state wide smoking ban. Despite all of the financial reasons for this to fail, it somehow still passed with 65% of the vote.
In 2009, the Iowa Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a proposed marriage ban was unconstitutional, becoming the first Midwestern state to allow marriage benefits for same-sex couples. While there was no incredible races to be watching last night, there was one important issue with unfortunate results: three of the Iowa Supreme Court judges that voted against the marriage ban have been voted out. Justice David Baker is out with a 54% “No” vote, Justice Michael Streit is out with a 54% “No” vote, and Chief Justice Marsha Ternus is out with a 55% “No” vote.
One of the most tightly-contested races in recent history, the Senate race between Harry Reid and Sharron Angle is exciting to watch. The race has literally been neck-and-neck the entire race, with each week having the other in the lead. This was one of the few races that everyone was talking about, and everyone was speculating exactly what was going to happen in this race. The results are stunning: Harry Reid squeaks a victory over Sharron Angle, with Reid receiving 51% of the votes.
The Alaska Senate race has been outstanding: Scott McAdams is the Democratic candidate. In a tight race, Joe Miller beats out Lisa Murkowski for the GOP nomination. But instead of accepting defeat, Murkowski, probably after a few snaps and an “Oh no you di’int,” announced she would be running as a write-in candidate.
So how is that race going? Murkowski is in the lead. Well, technically, “write-ins” is in the lead, with 41% of the vote. Joe Miller is in second place with 34% of the vote, and McAdams is in third with 24% of the vote with 76% of precincts reporting as of 7:22 am.
So what does this mean? The GOP has control of the House of Representatives, the Democrats have control of the Senate. With my non-knowledge of politics, I can honestly say I have no idea. The results clearly show that the American people are either truly upset with the way things were going and needed a change, or they are easily swept up into anti-establishment rhetoric. A lot of lies were shouted, and a lot of mud was slung in this election cycle, and discerning the truth from the baloney can be a tough thing to do.
If I had to speculate, I would say this could mean either one of two things. Ideally, this would be a step in a bipartisan direction. With one party in power on one side, and the other party on the other side, this is a perfect moment for everyone to sit down and listen to one another. Conversation is the key to making great progress in America.
However, this could also mean that absolutely nothing will get done. The House is full of Tea Party candidates, with platforms that really only included “repeal Obamacare” and “return to Christian values” without really saying how or why. The focus may only be on those two things, and then running for re-election. If this track happens, things will only get worse, and then we will have to wait and see if anything will happen in the election of 2012.